Claimed by Blaise Pascal
Serves 8 · 2 of 7 items checked · 4 aisles
Produce
- Checked by Baruch Spinoza
Meat & Poultry
Pantry / Durable
- Checked by Blaise Pascal
Gathering
1655 · Paris, France
Pascal hosts Spinoza and Locke in Paris and puts the wager to two philosophers who will not take the bet.
Pascal has withdrawn from the world to Port-Royal, but he keeps a table in Paris for visitors whose minds he respects. Spinoza, in the city on business, and Locke, travelling as a young physician and diplomat, have both come at his invitation.
Pascal lays out the wager over mutton pottage and a game pie: since reason cannot decide the question of God, the wise man weighs the stakes. Spinoza objects that a wager cannot manufacture belief and that the argument demeans the love of understanding; Locke objects that the probabilities are not equal. Pascal, who is ill and knows he has not long to live, is unbothered. The evening ends over marchpane and a posset.
Host: Blaise Pascal
Baruch Spinoza — Dutch philosopher and lens grinder, in Paris on family business.
John Locke — English physician and diplomat, at the start of a long career.
Everything you need to host this menu, sorted aisle by aisle:
The menu
11 of 32 items checked
Claimed by Blaise Pascal
Serves 8 · 2 of 7 items checked · 4 aisles
Claimed by Baruch Spinoza
Serves 8 · 3 of 7 items checked · 4 aisles
Claimed by John Locke
Serves 12 · 2 of 8 items checked · 4 aisles
Claimed by Blaise Pascal
Serves 12 · 1 of 3 items checked · 2 aisles
Claimed by Baruch Spinoza
Serves 4 · 3 of 7 items checked · 5 aisles
Blaise Pascal
Reason cannot decide whether God exists. So weigh the stakes: believe, and you gain everything; disbelieve, and you risk everything.
Baruch Spinoza
A wager is not a proof, and belief cannot be chosen like a coin. I would rather understand God than bet on him.
John Locke
And I would ask what we can know at all. The mind is a blank page; experience writes on it, and government is a trust we write ourselves.
Blaise Pascal
You are both very reasonable men. That is precisely the trouble.
A reconstruction — imagined from the figures' own writings.
This gathering is an editorial recreation grounded in the biographies of those present; it did not necessarily take place as described.